Online Program

283471
A randomized controlled health literacy trial to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage intake among adults: Rationale, design & early process findings


Tuesday, November 5, 2013 : 2:50 p.m. - 3:10 p.m.

Jamie Zoellner, PhD, RD, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
Yvonnes Chen, PhD, Nutrition, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
Valisa Hedrick, PhD, RD, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
Terri Corsi, MPH, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
Erin Krzeski, MS, RD, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virgina Tech, Blacksburg, VA
Paul Estabrooks, PhD, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
INTRODUCTION: Talking Health is a randomized controlled health literacy trial targeting community residents from rural southwest Virginia. The primary aim is to determine the effectiveness of a 6-month intervention aimed at decreasing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption (SIPsmartER) when compared to a matched contact control group targeting physical activity behaviors (MoveMore). This abstract describes health literacy intervention strategies and examines how health literacy status influences program participation rates. METHODS: Intervention components include three small interactive group classes, one live teach back telephone call to reinforce key concepts, and 11 interactive voice respsonse (IVR) telephone calls targeting goal setting, feedback, and support messages. Health literacy strategies include all written material written <8th grade reading level, intervention staff trained in clear communication techniques, and focused numeracy and media literacy content. The Newest Vital Sign was used to assess health literacy status at baseline. RESULTS: To date, 3 of 8 cohorts have been enrolled. Of 130 enrolled participants, mean age is 42 years, 91% non-Hispanic white, 76% female, 45% earn <$14,999 annually, 70% <college education, and 34% with limited literacy. Process data indicate rates of 67% for class attendance, 80% for teach-back call completion, and 60% for IVR completion. One-way ANOVA tests indicate that program participation rates do not vary by health literacy status. DISCUSSION: Opportunities and challenges for integration of health literacy strategies in the development, implementation and evaluation of community-based health behavior interventions will be discussed, along with considerations for how health literacy status and strategies may influence program participation rates.

Learning Areas:

Communication and informatics
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
Describe how to incorporate health literacy concepts in the development, implementation, and evaluation of health behavior interventions. Explain how health literacy status and strategies may influence program participation rates.

Keyword(s): Health Literacy, Nutrition

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am the principal investigator of this and several other federally funded health literacy grants. I have made over 25 professional conference presentations and have 40 peer-reviewed manuscripts, of which about 7 are specfic to health and nutrition literacy.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.