Online Program

334321
Climate Change Mitigating Health Co-Benefits of Healthy Transportation


Tuesday, November 3, 2015 : 3:30 p.m. - 3:50 p.m.

Jason Vargo, PhD, MPH, MCRP, Global Health Institute, University of Wisconsin -- Madison, Madison, WI

Maggie Grabow, PhD, MPH, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin -- Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
Scott Spak, PhD, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
Jonathan A. Patz, MD, MPH, Global Health Institute, Dept. Population Health Sci., & Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI

Background:

Assessments of transportation alternatives, such as bicycling, walking, and public transit, can better guide infrastructure investments with health benefits in mind. While much has been documented on health outcomes associated with transportation systems, quantification of specific health risks and benefits of alternative transportation is lacking. In addition to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants, decreasing the number of vehicle miles traveled by promoting bicycling and walking provides physical activity, an important component in preventing obesity and other chronic diseases. Bicycling, walking and other forms of active transport, therefore, could play a critical role in promoting public health.

Methods:

In this pilot study, we apply the Integrated Transport and Health Impact Model (ITHIM) at census tract level across the United States. We estimate the health benefits resulting from alternative land use scenarios through their effect on transportation mode choice and infrastructure.  In order to quantify and reduce uncertainty in each step of the process, we combine large observational datasets from partner communities, bikesharing services, and geolocated travel and fitness databases with high-resolution emissions/chemical transport modeling.  We assess net gains in health and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and fine particulate matter through different scenarios for each Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA).

Findings:

Results of this assessment define the sensitivity of health estimates to different air quality modeling methods and scales of analysis. Our findings describe how health co-benefits can be assessed at scales as fine as the US Census Tract, which is equivalent to individual neighborhoods in many large cities.

Conclusions:

This work benefits the environment, public health, and transportation planning by quantifying the health co-benefits of active transportation scenarios across the United States. Quantifying the health impacts of transportation systems can lead to better information and increased financial support on which to base healthy transportation planning.

Learning Areas:

Chronic disease management and prevention
Environmental health sciences

Learning Objectives:
Describe the health co-benefits of shifting to healthier modes of transportation.

Keyword(s): Climate and Health, Built Environment

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have been involved in funded grants focusing on the public health impacts of climate change and urban design. Among my scientific interests has been the development of strategies for increasing healthy behavior as part of regular active transportation.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.

Back to: 4309.0: Transportation