331251
A systems-level comparison of three implementing agencies and their community partners for a South Carolina program serving pregnant and parenting teens
Methods: Using two-stage purposeful sampling, we identified three lead agencies and their self-reported community partners. We administered a web-based survey grounded in social network and comprised of questions related to number and length of relationships, organizational characteristics, and attributes of trust and value. We measured individual characteristics of in-network actors, and compared network structure and cohesion measures across the three implementation sites.
Results: Survey response rate was 97.9% (46/47). Network sizes ranged from 16-19 partners, network diameters ranged from 1-3; average relational distance between actors was 1.7. Examining two important measures of network-level comparison, one network had a 61% density (ratio of possible to actual links) and average degree (number of ties) of 11.0, while the other networks had densities of 24% and 25%, with average degrees of less than five.
Conclusions: Our study found that the implementing community partnerships for pregnant and parenting teens differed in their levels of cohesiveness and connectedness at baseline. Successful implementation of programs in communities may ultimately be influenced by the partners’ ability to reconfigure relational patterns to better support program implementation. Monitoring changes in these measures over time will be key for determining successful program implementation.
Learning Areas:
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practiceLearning Objectives:
Describe the two network measures best suited for comparison across networks.
Explain the value of examining systems-level characteristics of health care delivery systems.
Keyword(s): Evaluation, Teen Pregnancy
Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have a doctoral degree in Health Services Research, an interest in Maternal and Child Health and community-based health program evaluation, and conducted the data collection and analysis for this evaluation.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.