330112
Determining Appropriateness in the Age of Patient Centered Care
Methods: In this methods study, pre-post design is utilized. Expert panels will convene to rate appropriateness of chiropractic care for chronic pain based on evidence and clinical experience. Data on patient-reported outcomes, preferences, and cost will be collected nationally from 1600 patients in 80 chiropractic clinics via systematic stratified sampling. Data will be analyzed and reported to panelists who reconvene to re-rate appropriateness of care, taking into account these new data. Ratings from first and second panel meetings will be compared to understand the effect of patient-centered outcomes on expert panels.
Results: The methods of this study will be presented. Preliminary data will be commented on, but reported at a later date.
Conclusion: This work is highly innovative in that previous appropriateness studies determined appropriate care based only on efficacy, effectiveness and safety. We expand the definition of appropriateness to match not only the needs of CAM (where patient self-referral is common, and, thus, patient preferences and resources have large roles in determining appropriate care), but also the needs of the increasing patient-centered focus and cost constraints of health care.
Learning Areas:
Chronic disease management and preventionPublic health or related public policy
Public health or related research
Social and behavioral sciences
Learning Objectives:
Describe the procedures for assessing appropriateness of chiropractic care for chronic low back and cervical pain.
Identify elements of patient preferences, outcomes, resource utilization that may be included in expert panels to increase patient centered health policy.
Keyword(s): Chiropractic, Chronic Disease Management and Care
Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am a co-PI on this project. I co-authored the proposal and am managing the research study. I have worked in evaluation contexts such as hospitals, clinics, military settings, and international development with a myriad of stakeholders. My specialty areas are health policy including program evaluation, complementary and alternative medicine, emergency preparedness, substance abuse, patient decision-making, and systematic literature reviews/meta analysis.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.