Online Program

327838
Reactions to smoke-free policies in the Southeastern U.S. and to messaging strategies in support and opposition


Wednesday, November 4, 2015 : 8:50 a.m. - 9:10 a.m.

Carla Berg, PhD, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
James F. Thrasher, PhD, Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
Jean O'Connor, JD, DrPH, Georgia Department of Public Health, Atlanta, GA
Regine Haardörfer, PhD, MEd, MS, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Michelle Kegler, DrPH, MPH, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Background: The Southeastern U.S. is lagging in public smoke-free policy implementation. This study explored differences in public support for smoke-free policies in the Southern region versus elsewhere in the U.S.

Methods: In 2013, a cross-sectional survey with US residents was conducted using a commercial online consumer panel. The survey assessed tobacco use, personal smoke-free policies, reactions to public smoke-free policies, and persuasiveness of messages about smoke-free policies, with messages framed as arguments regarding health, youth prevention, economic impact, individual rights/responsibility, morality/religion, and hospitality. Differences between Southerners and non-Southerners were analyzed.

Results: Of the sample of 2,501 adults, 36.7% were past 30-day smokers, 31.6% were racial/ethnic minorities, and 26.7% were Southerners, due to oversampling of key groups. Southerners were no different from non-Southerners in prevalence of personal smoke-free policies or support for most public smoke-free policies; in fact, Southerners were less oppositional to smoke-free bars (p=.003) and bowling alleys (p=.030). The most effective messages in support of smoke-free bars/restaurants were related to hospitality, health, and individual rights/responsibilities. Southerners vs. non-Southerners rated as more persuasive the pro-policy messages related to economic impact, religion/morality, and hospitality. The most persuasive messages against smoke-free policies involved individual rights/responsibilities.

Conclusions: Southerners are supportive of public smoke-free policies and receptive to various messaging strategies in support of them. Thus, public opinion may not be the cause of lagging adoption of comprehensive smoke-free policies in the South. As such, other factors warrant exploration. Moreover, public health professionals can use these messaging strategies to garner support for these policies.

Learning Areas:

Advocacy for health and health education
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Public health or related public policy
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
Analyze differences in public support for smoke-free policies in the Southern region versus elsewhere in the U.S.

Keyword(s): Tobacco Control, Policy/Policy Development

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am a PhD clinical health psychologist with expertise in tobacco control and health communications. I am an NIH and CDC funded investigator and an Assistant Professor in the Emory University School of Public Health.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.