Online Program

322091
Feasibility and acceptability of a community-led health promotion program to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in adults in rural Illinois


Tuesday, November 3, 2015 : 4:30 p.m. - 4:50 p.m.

Leslie Carnahan, MPH, Center for Research on Women and Gender, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
Kristine Zimmermann, MPH, Center for Research on Women and Gender, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
Heather Risser, PhD, Center for Research on Women and Gender, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
Background: Adults in rural, southernmost Illinois have an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared with Illinois overall. Prevention interventions may target modifiable behaviors like diet and physical activity; however, rural communities often have limited resources to promote sustained behavior change.

Methods: We partnered with nine churches and the local health department to implement Heart Smart Maintenance, a monthly booster program designed to sustain improved health behaviors after completion of a 12-week, evidence- and theory-based CVD risk reduction intervention. With participants’ input, community-based coordinators guided the 24-month booster program to ensure activities were tailored to local needs and resources. We analyzed coordinator and participant feedback to understand session content, successes and challenges, and assess feasibility and acceptability.

Results: From June 2012 to December 2014, coordinators implemented 122 maintenance sessions, serving 151 participants, with 1100 points of contact. Mean session attendance was 9.0 ± 3.9. Programming focused on both CVD risk and other health topics of interest to participants. Implementation challenges involved tailoring activities to different age groups and maintaining attendance. Successes included the creation of health-related church policies and high levels of satisfaction. Most participants agreed that they were able to apply information to make healthy lifestyle choices (95.9%) and they would recommend the program (94.6%).

Conclusion: Integration of community-based coordinators into health promotion programs is a feasible and acceptable model, especially in rural communities with limited health promotion resources. By tailoring programming to community needs and resources, this model has potential to facilitate maintenance of improved health behaviors.

Learning Areas:

Chronic disease management and prevention
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Program planning
Public health or related education
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
Explain the advantages of working with community-based coordinators in the development and implementation of programming to support and maintain healthy behaviors in rural adults. Identify the implementation successes and challenges of community-led and church-based health promotion programs in rural settings. Describe a process for assessing the feasibility and acceptability of implementing health promotion programs with community-based coordinators in churches in rural settings.

Keyword(s): Health Promotion and Education, Rural Health

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: As a doctoral student and research associate, I have over four years experience in research endeavors, including fieldwork and analysis. I conceptualized this research and conducted the analysis. My scientific interests include community-level influences on health. I have served as a coordinator of federally-funded rural health research, with a particular focus on topics including health promotion and chronic disease risk reduction.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.

Back to: 4403.0: Community-Driven Change