Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase
311684
Test-retest reliability of health behavior indicators in Community Health Survey in South Korea
Sunday, November 16, 2014
Soo Jeong Kim, PhD
,
Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
Jin A Han, MPH
,
Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
Bo Youl Choi
,
Department of Preventive Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, and Hanyang Institute of Health and Society, Seoul, South Korea
Su Young Kim, MD, PhD
,
School of Medicine, Jeju National University, Jeju-si, South Korea
Hun Je Lee, MD, PhD
,
School of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon si, South Korea
In Hwan Oh, MD, PhD
,
School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea
Jakyung Lee
,
Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
Soon Young Lee, MD, PhD
,
Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
Community Health Survey has been conducted every year since 2008. Major indicators from the survey provided evidences for developing community-based health policy. This study was aimed to assess the test-retest reliability of selected indicators in the survey questionnaire among adults in Korea. A sample of 159 men and women aged 20-69 years old participated in a test-retest procedure with a two-week interval. A total of 23 items concerning smoking, alcohol drinking, physical activity, weight control, and mental health were selected. We evaluated items by using the percent agreement, and kappa from X2 test. Percent agreement and kappa were ranging from 0.62 to 0.94 and from 0.40 to 0.89, respectively. We compared the mean of percent agreement and kappa value of items with domain (smoking, alcohol drinking, physical activity, weight control, and mental health), item characteristics(habit, recognition, and attitude), and response scale(two-, three-, four-, or five-point scale). Reliability had a different value for domain, item characteristic, and response scale. In domain, items asking smoking habit had a highest consistency (mean of percent agreement; 0.85, and mean of kappa; 0.70); whereas, items asking weight control had a lowest consistency (mean of percent agreement; 0.70, and mean of kappa; 0.52). In the item characteristics, items related to habit had the highest agreement (mean of percent agreement; 0.85, and mean of kappa; 0.70); whereas, items of attitude had the lowest agreement (mean of percent agreement; 0.55, and mean of kappa; 0.42). In response scale, items with two-point scale had the highest agreement (mean of percent agreement; 0.87, and mean of kappa; 0.64); whereas, items with five-point scale had the lowest agreement (mean of percent agreement; 0.69, and mean of kappa; 0.51). In linear regression model, two-point scale showed a better percent agreement, as compared to five-point scale after adjusting for domains and item characteristics(beta=0.152, p=0.002). Habit affected kappa positively, as compared to attitude after adjusting for domains and response scale (beta=0.308, p=0.015). Reliability of selected items in Community Health Survey was associated with item characteristics and response scale. Some items with low reliability might need to be modified regarding their item characteristics and response scale.
Learning Areas:
Epidemiology
Public health or related research
Learning Objectives:
Assess the test-retest reliability in community-based survey.
Compare reliabilities among domain, item characteristics, and response scale.
Keyword(s): Survey, Statistics
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to be an abstract Author on the content I am responsible for Ajou University School of Medicine.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.