Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase
309701
Exiting Poverty: Globally Comparative Policy Approaches for Improved Population Health
Monday, November 17, 2014
: 1:30 PM - 1:45 PM
Tina-Marie Assi, MPH, PhD
,
WORLD Policy Analysis Center, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Amy Raub, M.S.
,
Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Jody Heymann, M.D., Ph.D.
,
Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Poverty puts basic needs at risk (e.g., healthcare, shelter, adequate nutrition, safe drinking water, sanitation, electricity, and education). Despite progress against poverty over the last three decades, 2.4 billion people still live below the global poverty line of $2/day, well under the living wage. Creating and supporting national social protection policies ensuring economic security across population segments are essential first steps in alleviating poverty and improving population health. The WORLD Policy Analysis Center (WORLD) at the University of California, Los Angeles, developed quantitatively comparable databases on social policies in 193 United Nations countries aimed directly at reducing poverty. Using WORLD data, this analysis will explore whether countries are enacting key poverty-related policies that play fundamental roles in shaping population health: minimum wage protections ensuring all working adults earn incomes enabling them to escape poverty; income protection during circumstances endangering income security (e.g., unemployment, serious illness, and following work-related injuries), and for potentially vulnerable groups (e.g., persons with disabilities, families with children, and the elderly); and how these protections vary by region and income group. The World Bank estimates 1 billion people will still live in extreme poverty by 2015. Adequate social policies are essential first steps in affecting these projections. To date, there has been little readily accessible, easily comparable information on national policies and laws, making arguments for improving legal policy frameworks difficult. This study contributes to filling this knowledge gap, and shows that more can be done to measure and facilitate national action on social determinants of health.
Learning Areas:
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines
Public health or related public policy
Public health or related research
Social and behavioral sciences
Learning Objectives:
Compare 193 United Nations member countries and identify the leaders and laggards around national legal policy frameworks aimed directly at reducing poverty that have a fundamental role in shaping population health.
Describe the policy approaches countries are taking in reducing poverty through minimum wage protections; and income supports during unemployment, disability, following work-related injury, and for vulnerable populations.
Demonstrate the utility of readily accessible, easily comparable information regarding national social protection policies and laws on the ability to measure and facilitate national action on social determinants of health.
Keyword(s): Public Policy, Poverty
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: In addition to being a trained public health professional, over the last 7 years, I have researched the impacts of national public policies on population health and well-being, first at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation-funded Vaccine Modeling Initiative (University of Pittsburgh); then with the Healthier Societies Initiative at the Institute for Health and Social Policy (McGill University); and most recently with the WORLD Policy Analysis Center (University of California, Los Angeles).
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.