Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase
307773
Using community engagement methods and navigators to increase colon cancer screening and improve patient preparation for screening
Sunday, November 16, 2014
Susan Robinson, MBA
,
Northern Nevada, Access to Healthcare Network, Reno, NV
Jesse Gutierrez, MHA
,
Northern Nevada, Nevada Colon Cancer Partnership, Reno, NV
Janie Galvin
Megan Gibson
Andrea Esp, MPH, CPH, CHES
Barbara Larsen, MA
,
Social Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV
Heather Kerwin, MPH, CPH
,
School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV
Urmila Mainali, MPH, RN
John Gray, MD FACG AGAF
,
Gastroenterology Consultants, Reno, NV
Nevada has lower colorectal cancer screening rates than other states and a higher burden of colon cancer morbidity and mortality. A theory-driven tailored intervention developed in partnership with the community used evidence-based practices to a) increase knowledge about colon cancer and screening, and b) to assist patients in completing screenings. During the 16 months of delivery, community health workers (screening patient navigators) matched on the community’s gender and race/ethnicity, and integrated into gastroenterology clinic settings met all program goals which included a) enrolling an ethnically diverse group of hard-to-reach clinic-referred and community outreach patients into the program (N=415) b) screening 229 of the 392 (58%) patients identified as needing screening and c) obtaining over 90% of patients reporting satisfaction with the program. There were no differences by gender, age, or race/ethnicity among enrollees who obtained screening. A random sample (N=216) of non-navigated patients matched on gender and age collected from the participating gastroenterology clinics revealed no differences between navigated and non-navigated patients on polyps detected. Non-navigated males were significantly more likely than navigated males to have either poor or only fair bowel preparation quality, χ2(1)=5.48, p<.05. There was no difference between females. Low-quality bowel preparation is a concern for gastroenterologists as it leads to incomplete readings of the colon or requires cancelling a colonoscopy. This intervention shows that evidence-based screening patient navigator programs developed with the community and integrated with health care clinics are effective in a) increasing screenings among hard-to-reach and minority populations and b) improving bowel preparation quality for males.
Learning Areas:
Administer health education strategies, interventions and programs
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Diversity and culture
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Social and behavioral sciences
Learning Objectives:
Differentiate which components of a community-based screening navigator program are successful for enrolling patients and increasing screenings.
Identify successful community partnership strategies to increase cancer screenings.
Name which screening navigator activities are successful for which populations.
Keyword(s): Cancer Prevention and Screening, Community-Based Partnership & Collaboration
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to present because, in partnership with the community, I designed, implemented and evaluated this intervention. I have 15 years experience in designing and evaluating community-based interventions.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.