142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition

Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase

306529
Higher risk of death among rural dual-eligible Medicare beneficiaries

142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition (November 15 - November 19, 2014): http://www.apha.org/events-and-meetings/annual
Sunday, November 16, 2014

Ashley Robertson, JD , Department of Health Services Policy & Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
Janice C. Probst, PhD , University of South Carolina, South Carolina Rural Health Research Center, Columbia, SC
Kevin Bennett, PhD , Family & Preventive Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC

Purpose: Beneficiaries who are eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid constitute a high need population. In rural areas, reduced provider availability may lead to poorer health outcomes among these vulnerable adults. Our research explored potential mortality disparities associated with rural residence.  

Method: Using the 2009 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries (n=2,424,512), we identified 397,816 beneficiaries who were continuously eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid. The outcome studied was death from any cause during the year. Rural residence was defined at the county level using Urban Influence Codes. Multiple logistic regression models were used to analyze rural-urban differences in risk of death after adjusting for demographic (age, race, sex, region) and clinical (presence/absence of ESRD, Alzheimers, hospitalization during year) confounders.

Results: Rural dual-eligible Medicare beneficiaries had a higher risk of death than their urban counterparts (7.19% vs 6.07%).  Rural beneficiaries living in remote rural counties had the highest risk of death (7.56%); those living in micropolitan or small adjacent counties also experienced higher risk than urban beneficiaries (7.11% and 7.12%, respectively, p<.0001). In multivariable analysis, this disparity persisted, with rural dual-eligibles more likely to die than urban dual-eligible beneficiaries (OR 1.036, CI 1.003-1.071). When analyzed across rurality, higher risk was found only for micropolitan counties (OR 1.58, CI 1.016-1.101). 

Conclusion: Rural dual-eligible beneficiaries face an increased risk of death, even after adjusting for clinical condition.  Further research is needed to determine the degree to which this disparity may be associated with provider availability and with quality of care metrics.

Learning Areas:

Public health or related public policy
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
Compare rural and urban Medicare dual-eligible beneficiaries with respect to risk of death. Discuss the relationship between place of residence and mortality disparities.

Keyword(s): Medicare, Rural Health

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am a doctoral student in health services policy and management, and work as a research associate at the South Carolina Rural Health Research Center. This presentation is a portion of one of the projects on which I am working at the Center.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.

Back to: 2023.0: Environment and Aging