Online Program

290025
Is participation contagious? evidence from a household vector control campaign in urban Peru


Sunday, November 3, 2013

Alison M. Buttenheim, PhD, MBA, Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Valerie Paz-Soldan, PhD, Department of Global Community Health and Behavioral Science, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Lima, Peru
Corentin Barbu, PhD, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Christine Skovira, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Javier Quintanilla Calderón, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Arequipa, Peru
Lina Margot Mollesaca Riveros, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Arequipa, Peru
Juan Oswaldo Cornejo, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Arequipa, Peru
Dylan Small, PhD, Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Cristina Bicchieri, PhD, Philosophy Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Cesar Naquira, MD, DHM, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Arequipa, Peru
Michael Z. Levy, PhD, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Objectives: High rates of household participation are critical to the success of door-to-door vector control campaigns. We used the Health Belief Model to assess determinants of participation, including neighbor participation as a cue to action, in a Chagas disease vector control campaign in Peru. Methods: We evaluated clustering of participation among neighbors; estimated participation as a function of household infestation status, neighborhood type, and number of participating neighbors; and described reported reasons for refusal to participate in a district of 2911 households. Results: We observed significant clustering of participation along city blocks (p< .0001). Participation was significantly higher for households in new vs. established neighborhoods, for infested households, and for households with more participating neighbors. The effect of neighbor participation was greater in new neighborhoods. Conclusions: Results support a “contagion” model of participation, highlighting the possibility that one or two participating households can tip a block towards full participation. Future campaigns can leverage these findings by making participation more visible, by addressing stigma associated with spraying, and by employing group incentives to spray.

Learning Areas:

Administer health education strategies, interventions and programs
Epidemiology
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
Describe the correlates of household participation in a Chagas disease vector control campaign

Keyword(s): Urban Health, Infectious Diseases

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am the investigator of the study.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.