Physician perspectives on advanced directive discussions: An examination of perceived benefits and barriers
For this project, phenomenology was employed to analyze data. Participants were randomly selected. In one instance, they were asked to recall previous knowledge about cases where they presented patients with advance directive discussions. Lastly, they were presented with vignettes to simulate new phenomena where the natural attitude (existing knowledge from previous cases) could be compared and contrasted to the phenomenological attitude (the use of vignettes).
Some of the major findings were: Health trumped age in terms of when physicians initiated advance directive discussions with patients; physicians placed the responsibility for the initiation of advance directive discussions on patientsIts not my responsibility. As these variables were not considered in this project, future research should examine physicians by race, age and sex as predictors of when advance directive discussions might be initiated.
Learning Areas:Administer health education strategies, interventions and programs
Social and behavioral sciences
Discuss physician attitudes towards end of life care.
Keyword(s): Barriers to Care, End-of-Life Care
Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I conducted original research for the project that has been submitted for presentation. I have done work in this area for the last 5 years and now am focused in health policy (direct a center on health policy in Tennessee that is funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation), which my work on advance directives has very significance implications.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.