Online Program

283217
Delivering data for decision-making in Washington: An academic/practice partnership Examining state and local spending and services


Wednesday, November 6, 2013 : 12:30 p.m. - 12:50 p.m.

Betty Bekemeier, PhD, MPH, FAAN, Psychosocial and Community Health, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA
Marie Flake, MPH, RN, Office of Public Health Systems Planning and Development, Washington State Department of Health, Olympia, WA
Martin Mueller, MPA, Office of Public Health Systems Planning and Development, Washington State Department of Health, Olympia, WA
Greg Whitman, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Background: Tremendous unnecessary variation exists across local health departments, challenging the performance of public health systems and leaving populations potentially underserved. Through partnerships with practitioners and Public Health Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRN), the Public Health Activities and Services Tracking (PHAST) study is providing a comprehensive, accessible database for answering practice-based research questions. To date, PHAST has been examining these questions with states having particularly detailed, annual data regarding their local health departments' spending and services. Washington (WA) State's public health leaders have been early and prominent partners with PHAST, making use of this infrastructure to examine state-wide data and facilitate discussions, planning, and decision-making.

Methods: We compiled unique, annual LHD financial data from 1993 to 2010, to examine trends over time and differences among WA's 35 LHDs and in relation to LHD characteristics, lines of service provided, and local demographics. Specific visual displays of data were created in partnership with researchers and practitioners to maximize relevance and accessibility for practice leaders.

Results: Preliminary findings show per capita, inflation-adjusted changes over time per LHD in total revenue and changes in percent of revenue from various major funding sources¬ówith 2010 generally among the lowest budget year for WA LHDs. Two primary clusters exist among WA's LHDs, including those spending $25-50 per capita and those spending much more. Further analyses will examine trends in relation to service delivery and health outcomes. LHD leaders are using these displays of data to facilitate state-wide discussions for development of a long-term strategy for predictable and appropriate public health funding.

Conclusions: Existing detailed data, never previously accessible to practitioners for decision-making, can become a meaningful planning tool. Practice-relevant questions examined in partnership with researchers can support effective health policy and data-driven decision-making, providing opportunities for improvement in local public health performance.

Learning Areas:

Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Public health administration or related administration
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
Describe the opportunities that exist, in terms of existing and detailed local health department data, for practice-based research and practical decision-making. Describe the barriers that exist to making these data more accessible and relevant to practitioners. Describe the value to practice of having local public health leaders engage fully with data that represent change and variation in the public health investments they make over time.

Keyword(s): Financing, Public Health Administration

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have substantial experience in public health practice, public health practice-based research, and public health systems.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.