Online Program

281527
Smoke-free policy in Vermont public housing authorities


Monday, November 4, 2013

Tyler Lemay, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
Charles Hackett, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
Joshua Hood, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
Jessica Lane, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
Edith Laryea-Walker, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
Adam Paine, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
Monique-Terese Squires, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
Rebecca Ryan, American Lung Association in Vermont, Williston, VT
David Kaminsky, MD, Medicine-Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
Thomas V. Delaney, PhD, Pediatrics, UVM College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
Jan K. Carney, MD, MPH, Medicine, Robert Larner MD College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
Introduction: Millions of adults and children living in public housing face exposure to second hand smoke from adjacent apartments. These tenants are less able to escape smoke exposure by moving, and Housing Authorities are beginning to implement smoke-free policies. We assessed the status of smoke-free policy in Vermont public housing, and explored the experience of tenants and managers in Burlington who recently implemented such a policy. Methods: We contacted Vermont Housing Authorities by telephone to assess the status of smoke-free policy in their multi-unit housing. Tenants living in smoke-free housing completed a survey assessing their opinion about the smoke-free policy. Building managers participated in a structured interview to describe their experience managing a smoke-free building. Results: Seven out of nine Housing Authorities provided data on 2,464 units in multi-unit buildings. Policy to restrict smoking existed in 14.3% of units serving families, and 39.4% of units serving elderly or disabled tenants. 49 tenants completed the survey. 61% believe smoking still occurs inside. 70% of tenants support the smoking ban in their building. Support was strongest among non-smokers (p<0.0001). The managers estimated >90% compliance. Managers reported difficulty proving policy violations, unexpected building expenses, and criticism from mobility impaired residents. Conclusion: Despite dangers to tenants, most public housing in Vermont allows smoking. Most concerning, units housing children and families were least likely to restrict smoking. Although there are significant barriers to implementing smoke-free policy, several agencies reported successful implementation. Adherence to policies may increase if accommodations, such as designated outdoor spaces, are provided.

Learning Areas:

Administer health education strategies, interventions and programs
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines
Public health or related public policy
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
Describe the epidemiology of smoke-free housing policy in public housing in Vermont. Discuss barriers to implementation of smoke-free housing policy. Formulate strategies to successfully implement smoke-free housing policy in public housing.

Keyword(s): Tobacco Policy, Housing

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I actively participated in the design, implementation, analysis, writing, and presentation of this project.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.