Back to Annual Meeting
|
Back to Annual Meeting
|
APHA Scientific Session and Event Listing |
Christina Mickey, BS, RS, Public Health, Monongalia County Health Department, 453 Van Voorhis Road, Morgantown, WV 26505, 304.598.5139, christinamickey@wvdhhr.org and Garland Holley, MA, Division of Tobacco Prevention, Bureau For Public Health, Room B-55 350 Capitol Street, Charleston, WV 25301-3715.
Most Public Health Policies, like clean indoor air regulations, produce good levels of compliance with very little effort from regulatory agencies. Most violations of clean indoor air regulations are considered minor and most inspectors allow these types of violations to be corrected on site or within a certain time frame. The prosecution of “cheaters and sneakers” for violations of public health laws are nearly impossible. Most regulators find few violators to be blatant and openly defiant with most public policies. However, comprehensive clean indoor air regulations may produce the greatest number of blatant violators. Inspectors and regulators must recognize that normal compliance efforts and traditional legal remedies may not deter or eradicate this type of violator. Traditionally, regulators have relied upon fines and or magistrate courts to assess punishment for past violations. Injunctive relief through court orders has been shown to be an effective legal tool in gaining compliance of clean indoor air regulations. Court orders can produce immediate compliance and also address future violations. Analyzing all available legal options for inspectors and regulators is highly recommended in dealing with blatant violators of any public health policy.
Learning Objectives:
Keywords: Tobacco Policy, Health Departments
Presenting author's disclosure statement:
Not Answered
The 134th Annual Meeting & Exposition (November 4-8, 2006) of APHA