APHA
Back to Annual Meeting Page
 
American Public Health Association
133rd Annual Meeting & Exposition
December 10-14, 2005
Philadelphia, PA
APHA 2005
 
4068.0: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 - 10:50 AM

Abstract #121737

Public health vs. court-sponsored secrecy

Anthony Robbins, MD, MPA, Department of Family Medicine & Community Health, Tufts University School of Medicine, 136 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02111, 617 636 0834, Anthony.robbins@tufts.edu

Civil litigation uncovers a great deal of otherwise unavailable information about practices and products which may cause disease and injury. However, common practices in and related to lawsuits, trials, and courts can operate to deprive public health authorities and the public itself of information that might be helpful to prevent disease, injury, disability, and death. I describe the important debate about “court-sponsored” secrecy: should courts, as public entities devoted to dispute resolution, tolerate, endorse, or protect secrecy when the sequestered information might help protect the public health?

Learning Objectives:

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

I wish to disclose that I have NO financial interests or other relationship with the manufactures of commercial products, suppliers of commercial services or commercial supporters.

Sequestered Science: The Public Health Consequences of Undisclosed Knowledge

The 133rd Annual Meeting & Exposition (December 10-14, 2005) of APHA