APHA
Back to Annual Meeting Page
 
American Public Health Association
133rd Annual Meeting & Exposition
December 10-14, 2005
Philadelphia, PA
APHA 2005
 
3248.0: Monday, December 12, 2005 - Board 7

Abstract #116038

Evidence-based labeling and guidelines for oral contraceptives: Are we there yet?

Kate Schaffer, MSc, Ibis Reproductive Health, 2 Brattle Square, Cambridge, MA 02138, 617-349-0024, kschaffer@ibisreproductivehealth.org, Tara Shochet, MPH, Population Studies Center, University of Michigan, 426 Thompson Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, and Daniel Grossman, MD, FACOG, Reproductive Health Program, Population Council, Panzacola 62-102, Col. Villa Coyoacán, Mexico, Mexico.

Oral contraceptives (OCs) are an important, routine aspect of health care for American women. According to the most recent National Survey of Family Growth, 19% of American women rely on OCs for their birth control, and over 82% of women have used OCs at some point in their lives. Nevertheless, evidence indicates that many women overestimate the health risks associated with OCs and that misinformation and fear may dissuade even greater numbers of women from taking advantage of the contraceptive and non-contraceptive benefits of OCs. The FDA and the World Health Organization (WHO) are the two main normative bodies responsible for setting labeling and use guidelines for contraceptives. Therefore, their recommendations and warnings should be based upon the most current research available. We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature on the safety of OCs and compared the contraindications and warnings listed in the current product labeling, the most recent Guidance for Industry circulated by FDA, and the WHO's Medical Eligibility Criteria to determine if there was consistency among the guidance documents and whether their recommendations reflect the most up-to-date research. We found important differences between the FDA labeling and the WHO Medical Eligibility Criteria and determined that current OC labeling does not reflect the most up-to-date research available on their safety. Furthermore, the labeling is often vague and uses inexact terminology for some contraindications. The inclusion of outdated or unsubstantiated information may deter health care providers from prescribing OCs and it may discourage women from using OCs.

Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of the session, participants will

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

I wish to disclose that I have NO financial interests or other relationship with the manufactures of commercial products, suppliers of commercial services or commercial supporters.

Best Practices and Knowledge Management in Reproductive Health Services: Tools, Interventions and Outcomes

The 133rd Annual Meeting & Exposition (December 10-14, 2005) of APHA