|
Julia A. Lee, PhD1, David W. Bradley, PhD2, William Feigelman, PhD3, and Robert H. Friis, PhD1. (1) Department of Health Science, California State University, Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, CA 90840, 562.985.2301, julee@csulb.edu, (2) Academic Computing Services, California State University, Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, CA 90840, (3) Sociology Department, Nassau Community College, 1 Education Drive, Garden City, NY 11530
Introduction: We observed an
increase in prevalence of former smokers in Long Beach between 1998 and 2000,
the third year of the law that banned smoking in California bars. To contribute
to a generalizable understanding of those quitters, we fitted a model to
distinguish between quitters and smokers and applied the model to predict the
proportion of quitters in 2000.
Methods: Data were
obtained from two telephone surveys conducted at the ends of 1998 (N=1502) and
2000 (N=1506). With variables measuring Demographics, Tobacco-Control
Attitudes, and Exposure to Location-Specific Smoking Bans, we used step-wise
logistic regression and fitted a model to predict quitters. Using the 1998
independent-variable means, we calibrated the model to match precisely the observed
1998 quitter proportions; we then applied the model to predict the year 2000
quitter proportions from that year's independent-variable means.
Results: Among the 1998
ever smokers, 56.3% were quitters. For 2000, the model predicted 62.9%
quitters, just slightly more than the observed proportion of 60.8%. Three
variables that contributed the highest percentage to the predicted increase in
quitters were the Need for Protection from Secondhand-Smoke Scale (34.1%),
Personal Approval for the 1998 law that extended a workplace-smoking ban to
workers in bars (22.6%), and the presence of a Home Smoking Ban (26.3%).
Conclusions: Successful
variables combined predictive strength with sufficient change between 1998 and
2000. These variables primarily comprised direct measures of attitudes toward
tobacco control in the form of bans on smoking, along with exposure to a ban on
smoking in the home.
Learning Objectives:
Keywords: Smoking Cessation, Public Health Policy
Presenting author's disclosure statement:
I do not have any significant financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with any organization/institution whose products or services are being discussed in this session.