The 131st Annual Meeting (November 15-19, 2003) of APHA |
Dawn Larsen, PhD CHES and Margaret Murray-Davis, PhD. Health Science Department, Minnesota State University, Mankato, 213 Highland Center North, Mankato, MN 56001, 507.389.2113, dawn.larsen@mankato.mnsu.edu
The topic of abortion has polarized much of the US population, and advocates on both ends of the spectrum tend to see the issue in absolute terms. Many feel abortion is a deeply personal issue, related to moral, religious, ethical, and social convictions, and wrong under most circumstances. Others see abortion as central to individual freedom of choice; a fundamental human right. Most hold a position somewhere between the two extremes, believing that abortion should be available during early pregnancy and sharply restricted after a certain time. Pervasive debate over the availability of abortion, however, has forced this procedure into public and political arenas, where it remains highly visible and controversial. Unfortunately, objective discussion if this issue is often difficult because some are fiercely protective and defensive about their individual views. This paper offers a critical thinking approach, providing a neutral platform which can avoid divisive and nonproductive personal conflicts or ideological agendas. Critical thinking has been identified as a primary skill for health-literate individuals and is extremely productive for discussing potentially volatile issues such as abortion. Because abortion is related to a number of physical and emotional health issues affecting women, productive presentation of this issue is of fundamental importance to public health professionals.
Learning Objectives:
Keywords: Abortion, Community Education
Presenting author's disclosure statement:
I do not have any significant financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with any organization/institution whose products or services are being discussed in this session.