 |
The 130th Annual Meeting of APHA |
|
The 130th Annual Meeting of APHA |
2013.0: Sunday, November 10, 2002: 8:00 AM-6:00 PM | |||
Oral | |||
| |||
| Statement of Purpose and Institute Overview: | |||
| Health People 2010 calls for the elimination of health disparities in the United States. American Indians/Alaska Natives and Native Hawaiians experience disparities in multiple health indicators including: hypertension, diabetes, asthma, cirrhosis, and cancer survival. Community-based approaches are necessary to provide active participation, and culturally respectful research is needed to ensure successful projects with valid and reliable data. However, conceptual and methodological approaches are commonly unacceptable to Native communities and can leave a community threatened and distrusting of all research and researchers. This institute will present information and models from active and successful Native and non-Native researchers to address issues central to the success of research projects. The value of community/tribal partnerships, examples of successful research projects and problems and solutions in designing protocols to meet community and academic goals will be presented. | |||
| Learning Objectives: Upon completion of the institute, participants will be able to: 1. Understand the values that Native people have in common. 2. Become familiar with why thee values are important to conducting research in Tribal communities. 3. Understand the impact of the historical socio-political context on Native communities. 4. Identify practical issues in conducting research with Native communities 5. Identify the process of engaging the Tribal community during the development of the research. 6. Understand the importance of reporting to the Tribal community 7. Recognize the importance of creating common ground with Tribal communities in the consultation process. 8. Understand the concept of sovereignty in Tribal Nations and describe why this is important in consultation. 9. Recognize the importance of building trust between agencies and tribal communities. 10. Construct a reasonable timeline for research projects involving Native communities. 11. Identify two projects considered successes by both the Native community and the research body. 12. Articulate 2-3 elements of projects considered successful by both the Native community and the research body. 13. Identify elements within a sample case study that are not respectful of Native communities 14. Design/re-design a research protocol that is respectful of the Native community. | |||
| See individual abstracts for presenting author's disclosure statement and author's information. | |||
| Teshia Solomon, PhD | |||
| Welcome (Randall) | |||
| Core Native Values Ben Muneta | |||
| What to Consider When Conducting Research in Native Communities Delight E. Satter, MPH | |||
| Break | |||
| Building Partnerships: Engaging and Reporting to Tribal Communities Leslie L. Randall, RN, MPH | |||
| Issues in Tribal Consultation: Creating Common Ground Jennifer A Giroux, MD | |||
| Lunch Break (Annual Meeting Opening General Session) | |||
| Community-based Research in American Indian/Alaska Native Populations: Collaborating with Federal, State or other Agencies Lillian Tom-Orme, PhD | |||
| Examples of Research in Native Communities Thomas K. Welty, MD, MPH, Felicia Schanche Hodges, DrPH | |||
| Break | |||
| Problem-based Learning: Improving Research Case Studies Teshia Solomon, PhD | |||
| Evaluation | |||
| Closing | |||
| Organized by: | APHA-Continuing Education Institutes | ||
| CE Credits: | CME, Health Education (CHES), Nursing, Pharmacy, Social Work | ||