The 130th Annual Meeting of APHA |
Rene I. Jahiel, MDPhD, President, International Health Policy Research, 250 Main Street(#732), Hartford, CT 06106, 860-547-1202, jahiel@nso2.uchc.edu
Discourse analysis provides interpretations based on descriptions of power relations in historically specific contexts. It includes 1) historical basis of present power relations; 2) structural analysis of a) privileged access to the “discourse”; b) types of objectives of one group over another; c) means of exerting power; d) power structures; and e) rationalization to support power arrangements (Penny Powers. The Methodology of Discourse Analysis. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett, 2001, pp. 53-56). I used it to plan and evaluate alcohol screening and brief intervention (ASBE) and screening for homelessness risk factors (SHRF) in a teaching hospital-based clinic staffed by 80 internal medicine residents under supervision of university faculty, supported by a community action grant. The power groups are: 1) the university that provides the teaching; 2) the hospital that provides the clinic; 3) the medical residents; 4) a multidisciplinary community action group; 5) a lone, highly articulate consumer; and 6) the program coordinator. Analyses of minutes of planning meetings and encounters were used to help develop programs in context of power relationships and barriers thereof. Within a year, ASBE (an innovation congruent with clinic practice) and SHRF (an innovation that deviates from past clinic practice) were adopted and implemented. The systematic analysis of power relationships provided by discourse analysis is a useful complement to needs-based planning and evaluation
Learning Objectives:
Keywords: Community Health Planning, Hospitals
Presenting author's disclosure statement:
I do not have any significant financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with any organization/institution whose products or services are being discussed in this session.