3167.4: Monday, October 22, 2001 - Board 5

Abstract #31902

Defining neighborhood indicators in community-based dietary modification program

Allyn M. Fernandez1, D.J. Bowen, PhD1, Carol P. Somkin, PhD2, and Andrea Altschuler, PhD2. (1) Cancer Prevention Research Program, Fred Hutchinson Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N. MPE702, Seattle, WA 98109, 206-667-7250, afernand@fhcrc.org, (2) Division of Research, Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, 3505 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94611

Public health utilizes community-based involvement in order to implement positive lifestyle changes. Therefore, information regarding how the public defines communities and their attitudes toward neighborhoods may be critical components in accomplishing health-related goals. Drawing on data received from the dietary change program implemented in religious organizations, we will present information regarding the populations' identification with community groups (specifically, how pertinent these groups are in providing a personal sense of belonging). Completed surveys (n=758) were used for this analysis, collected from religious organizations recruited to participate in a randomized, dietary change program. The questions focused on neighbors, faith community, friends outside neighborhood, family within 30miles, family further than 30 miles, people at employment, and people in clubs/organizations. For each group, participants indicated how important each group helped in providing a sense of belonging or comfort in their community, on a scale of 1-5(5=very much). We found that the majority of participants (50.8%) defined their neighborhoods as 1-6 blocks surrounding their homes. Respondents gave very high importance to the following community groups of people: faith communities (53.8%), friends living outside the neighborhood (53.6%), family within 30 miles (59.4%), and family further than 30 miles (48%). Less importance was given to neighbors (31.9%), people at employment (16.6%), and people in clubs/ organizations (26.9%). This data will contribute in identifying communities and support systems that have the most beneficial impact for health promotion programs.

Learning Objectives:

  • Identify the top three community groups that provide participants the strongest personal sense of belonging.
  • Recognize how participants define community.
  • Discuss which support systems may have the most beneficial impact for health promotion programs.
  • Keywords: , Community-Based Care

    Presenting author's disclosure statement:
    Organization/institution whose products or services will be discussed: None
    I do not have any significant financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with any organization/institution whose products or services are being discussed in this session.

    The 129th Annual Meeting of APHA