3161.0: Monday, October 22, 2001 - Board 5

Abstract #24223

California AOD prevention community's movement to research-based approaches

Friedner D. Wittman, PhD, Institute for the Study of Social Change, University of California (Berkeley), 837 Folger Avenue, Berkeley, CA 94710, 510-540-4717, fwittman@uclink4.berkeley.edu, Stephen J. Wirtz, PhD, Epidemiology and Prevention for Injury Control (EPIC) Branch, California Department of Health Services, 611 N. Seventh Street, MS 39 A, P.O. Box 942732, Sacramento, CA 94234, Paul Brower, MA, Prevention Division, California Departmetnt of Alcohol and Drug Programs, 1700 K Street, Sacramento, CA 95814, and Greg Wolfe, MA, Healthy Kids Program office, California Department of Education, 721 Capitol Mall, Sacramento, CA 95814.

Adoption of research-based approaches to prevention is now required by two federal agencies (USDHHS, USDOE) that provide the bulk of funds for community-level AOD prevention programs in California (CSAP/SAPT, SDFSC(TitleIV). Funneled through California's Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs (ADP), these federal funds support 58 county ADPs and approximately 425 community-based contract organizations. With USDOE funds the California Department of Education (DOE) operates a parallel program through county offices of education. Based on a history of capacity-based rather than outcome- and results-based activities, California AOD prevention providers face major challenges in changing current operations to adopt research-based approaches at the local level. Dissemination of best/promising practices (B/PP), the approach encouraged by the federal agencies, is making slow progress. Most county ADPs and local contractors prefer to develop their own capacity to undertake research-based approaches. The state ADP and DOE are responding with a broad range of training and technical assistance in addition to supporting B/PP dissemination. This paper describes (1) state ADP and DOE actions to move research-based approaches into practice at local (community) levels; (2) factors at the local level that encourage and impede successful adoption of research-based approaches; (3) California Prevention Collaborative efforts to develop statewide community response; and (4) public health planning issues emerging from the AOD prevention community's response to federal pressure to adopt research-based prevention approaches. California's experience will interest both other states forming their own responses to these federal requirements and the federal agencies involved with their implementation.

Learning Objectives: No special comments

Keywords: Substance Abuse Prevention, Community Programs

Presenting author's disclosure statement:
Organization/institution whose products or services will be discussed: California State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs (DADP), California county DADPs, California Department of Education, California county offices of education, not-for-profit community-based organizations delivering prevention services, California P
I do not have any significant financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with any organization/institution whose products or services are being discussed in this session.

The 129th Annual Meeting of APHA